The Rog's Rant
Overtime playoff hockey must never be taken away
The National Hockey League made a pile of changes after the
2004 lock-out, and most of them have worked out quite well.
I like most of the rule changes, I think the game is a lot
better and as always, the first round of the NHL playoffs is
my favorite time of the sporting year.
And before I make my main point let me say this – I
love the shootout in the regular season, one of the more radical
changes that was made. It’s exciting, the fans love it
and over the course of an 82-game season, it made for some great
drama.
But despite that, there is one change the NHL must never,
never, never make – and that is to eliminate sudden death
overtime in the Stanley Cup playoffs.
Shootouts are fine to break up the monotony of the long regular
season and to throw the fans a bit if a bone. But when it comes
to finishing off a playoff season or series, there is nothing
that is more exciting to watch then overtime hockey.
It could be over in a few seconds with one shot, or it could
take all night and four or five or even six periods of overtime
hockey. But either way I love to watch overtime in the NHL playoffs
and if you ask the players, they love the challenge of playing
overtime playoff hockey as well.
The late great film director Alfred Hitchcock, the master
of suspense on the giant screen, had a great theory of what
drama was all about.
If you put a bomb under somebody’s chair in a movie
and it goes off unexpectedly, you have several seconds of unbelievable
suspense and terror. But if you put the bomb there, and tell
the viewer it’s there, you can create hours of unbelievable
suspense and terror with the anticipation of that bomb going
off. He reasoned the tension of PERHAPS the bomb going off was
thicker than the bomb actually going off (which is why in so
many of his movies he let viewers know who the killer was early
in the movie instead of making them guess).
Think about it. It’s the anticipation that creates the
tension – and as great as shootout are, they are over
in a few minutes.
How quickly does an overtime end? Maybe in five seconds, or
maybe in five hours. How perfect is that?
And of course, there’s the matter of integrity of the
game. Critics of the shootout point out that it’s only
one dimension of the game as opposed to a real game, and that
is a valid point.
It’s one thing when a shootout costs you a regular season
point, but quite another when it costs you your season in the
seventh game of a playoff series (and yes Leaf fans, I know
they lost a playoff spot in a shootout but they had 82 chances
to get that extra needed point and lots of pervious shootouts
too).
I really enjoy the shootouts in the regular season, they are
fun to watch and provide great drama – and they have eliminated
ties from hockey. But overtime playoff hockey, where any one
shift or shot can end the game – now that’s great
drama!
The shootout is the bomb going off unexpectedly in a movie.
The playoff overtime is the tension waiting to see if it goes
off after you know it’s planted there.
I love Alfred Hitchcock movies for the same reason I love
overtime hockey – the prolonged suspense in both is amazing.
Shootouts in the regular season can stay. But shootouts to
decide a Stanley Cup playoff game?
Never.
Comments on The Rant of April 8 on The Final 4:
“I went to a Sweet 16 game this year for the first time
and it really was a spectacle. If only we celebrated our amateur
athletes in Canada the way they do in the States.” –
Gino in Toronto
“Absolutely disgraceful that we can’t even get our
Final 4 basketball tournament on TV in Canada.” –
Chris in Kitchener
Email your comments to therog@rogerlajoie.com
Other Rog's Rants & Reader Comments To read Roger's previous Rants, please visit the Rant
Archives section of the website. |